|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/09/30 11:17
> From: "Travis Newbury" <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com>
> dorayme wrote:
>>> Oh I completely agree with you. You can find a million times where I
>>> say that most sites, especially if they depend on their website for
>>> revenue, should be accessible to as many people as possible. But what I
>>> have a problem with is "need to be". I don't believe the web should be
>>> regulated so a site "has" to be accessible, or usable. Yes, if I am
>>> selling widgets it only make sense to have my site accessible, and
>>> usable by as many as possible.
>> That is not the impression you gave at the very beginning of this thread
>> when it was still called Trading Post. You were quite happy that the site
>> concerned was as slow as hell in operation on dial up.
>
> No I was not quite happy, I was indifferent. I am (as was stated later)
> on broadband and I do not see those speed issues.
OK. But what happens to your indifference when you have to make a site that
needs to be accessed by the general public around the world? Do you maintain
the indifference anyway? Do you lose it? Can you lose it on broadband? Where
money is concerned, would you find a way?
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|