|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 05/30/06 20:32
To further the education of mankind, "Chris Tomlinson" <anon@anon.com>
vouchsafed:
>> It was superhighstreet. That didn't look bad at all with relative
>> fonts and still doesn't look bad in Firefox. I suspect your
>> insistence on changing it relates to a somewhat primitive notion of
>> what does and does not look good in a web page. The best pages I've
>> seen readjust the placement of their content with elegant facility.
>> superhighstreet almost fits/did fit in that category now/then, and
>> with just a little more effort on your part, would. Of course not
>> everyone seeks perfection in the perfect way.
>
> Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. I tweaked the shadows so they
> don't break when the tables are enlarged, and I can live with the
> bullet point lines wrapping over to 2 lines if someone wants large
> fonts in Firefox (a rare combination I think).
Best of luck. Your site _is_ pretty attractive overall.
--
Neredbojias
Infinity has its limits.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|