|
Posted by David Hεsδther on 05/31/06 19:44
Michael Winter <m.winter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> <!doctype p><p>
[...]
> I wondered if there might be trickery along those lines. However,
> a(n irrelevant) philosophical question: would that actually count
> as a valid HTML document? Yes, it may validate against a HTML DTD,
> but without the html element as the root element, is it still
> HTML, or just a fragment?
Actually, it's impossible to tell from the doctype declaration alone,
whether a document is this or that. For a lengthier discussion on this
topic, see
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.sgml/msg/c3e53dee2c152a81>
--
David HΓ₯sΓ€ther
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|