|
|
Posted by Mark Parnell on 05/31/06 23:45
Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, Toby Inkster
<usenet200605@tobyinkster.co.uk> declared in alt.html:
> dorayme wrote:
>
>> His existence is part of his essential nature. The idea of a
>> non-existent God is a silly idea. After all, the idea of God is
>> of a perfect being, how perfect would a non-existent God be?
>
> This is an old, and seriously flawed argument.
Agreed. It's like the Babel Fish. It proves God exists and so therefore
He doesn't. :-)
> For example, say anything that exists has a height.
But that is also a false assumption. What is the height of gravity?
> So if God is defined as a perfect being, God cannot exist, as existence
> implies imperfection.
Only with a limited view of existence.
--
Mark Parnell
My Usenet is improved; yours could be too:
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|