|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/01/06 04:57
In article <cc75b$447e7072$40cba7b0$29318@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> > Your post with the diags and explanations do not meet the idea of
> > a strict general definition. I suspect there is just a whole
> > collection of posts like yours with little diags and sentences
> > and they all add up to the general idea.
> >
>
> Didn't know the idea was to create a strict definition but communicate a
> concept. Anyway I'm an artist, what you you expect!
You are a good man, Jonathan, you do as well as any of us to get
the idea across. I just made a remark a while back that it is
probably an illusion to think one can put the idea to cover all
we want to cover in a simple definition. I am not going to
suddenly give this up because there are a lots intelligent ways
of communicating various parts of the general idea. It is simple
enough to know when a table is being used for layout without need
of a definition. Giving one, opens one up to counter-examples. I
am saying thatthis process is probably never ending and not
because of anyone's stupidity.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|