|
|
Posted by Frankly on 10/14/69 11:50
"J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> wrote in message
news:4fb1eiF1hup8mU1@individual.net...
> strawberry wrote:
>
>> I'm still not sure that the images bit is flexible enough, but I guess
>> it's a start.
>
> It depends on what would be stored there, if it's with full path to the
> image, then it may or may not be enough, but if it's just the name of the
> image (you can hardcode the path, so you don't need to save that in the
> table), then many digital cameras uses 8.3 (12 character in total) as the
> name for the image, in this case the 50 would be over kill, but then I
> don't know what Frankly want to store.
>
>
> //Aho
I dont really know what hardcoding the path involves. As to what I want to
do.
I would have to ask your opinions on the subject. which would be better for
me at my skill level lol.
any recommendations on which way to go would be great.
Frank
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|