|
|
Posted by Andrew on 06/19/06 10:33
On 19 Jun 2006 02:43:28 -0700, "Travis Newbury"
<TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
>cwdjrxyz wrote:
>> Your page completely validates as html 4.01 strict and CSS at the W3C
>> validators. I could name many pages from the sites of huge companies
>> that do not do that. Keep up the good work.
>
>That is because any company that had a site this bland is out of
>business.
Hi Travis,
Thanks for the comment :-) What you say is totally true, a company
would not travel far with such a site. But of course my aim is not to
produce a site for such a company, and I do not have those skills.
<serious stuff>
My aim is to produce a small, personal site purely as a hobby. I aim
to learn a lot about HTML/CSS/W3C etc while doing it and meet some
interesting people online while doing it. Maybe I can eventually make
a useful contribution to the online world, I hope so. This definitely
takes a back seat to my 'day job' but it is a fascinating part of my
life.
</serious stuff>
Anyway thanks for your comment,
Andrew Strong.
--
Andrew Strong
http://people.aapt.net.au/~adjlstrong/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|