|
Posted by dorayme on 07/31/06 07:14
In article <12qy467scxxca.1x64l13mpqiwz$.dlg@40tude.net>,
Els <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> TC wrote:
>
.....
>
> That's exactly why dorayme said the non-existence of the h7 is not
> exactly relevant. (IIUC of course..)
Hey, yeah! I withdraw my last concession to TC that I may have
misunderstood.
Perhaps we could say this: it was understood enough to have some
fun.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|