Posted by Ted on 10/03/37 11:54

Thanks Roy and David

I think Roy is right in postulating what I need to replace my "keys"
with is MS SQL's 'index'. I hadn't thought of that before because
MySQL also supports 'index'.

Yes, I am fully aware of foreign key constraints and their use (and I
routinely use them), but I have not encountered problems with them yet.


For additional reference, I have visited our nearest Chapter's looking
for references on Transact SQL, but I have yet to find one. I guess I
will have to break down and go to Toronto to look for such a reference
(a day trip in which half the time will be spent driving). BTW, I just
bought MS Visual Studio 2005 and so I am working with the developer's
edition of MS SQL. Does this help in making suggestions to narrow my
search for books to exclude unreliable or unusable books? What I would
find ideal is a book that thoroughly covers transact SQL, including the
fine details of what MS did and why, when options (such as clustering a
key) should be used and why, how MS has interpreted the standard and
what extensions they've provided, etc. Objective comparisons with
other RDBMS would be icing on the cake: useful but not necessary. ;-)
Has anyone seen such a book, or something reasonably close?

Thanks,

Ted

• Next in forum: Re: questions about keys - porting code from MySQL to MS-SQL
• Prev in forum: Re: More questions about porting from MySQL to MS SQL
• Thread view: Re: questions about keys - porting code from MySQL to MS-SQL

[Reply to this message]