|
|
Posted by Harlan Messinger on 09/12/06 19:19
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> scripsit:
>
>>> Now, will you follow your own logic and send me your money, please?
>>
>> Your simulation here isn't binding - -
>
> I guess that's a "No" answer in pseudo-legalese. Too bad, I would have
> had some use for some extra money, but I wasn't really holding my breath.
>
Now that you've established that something that isn't a legal contract
isn't a legal contract, shall we go on to establish that a document in
which I bequeath only things that belong to other people isn't a legal
will? Or some other tautology? Either way, you still haven't explained
why EULAs have no legal meaning, which is what I originally asked you
about. What was the purpose of this digression?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|