|
|
Posted by matt on 09/13/06 16:22
Harlan Messinger wrote:
> It's a CSS keyword, not a class.
my terminology may not be exactly correct, but my point gets across. i
have far too many technologies & languages under my belt to worry about
appeasing random HTML slingers on usenet.
> It must be, since the place where you just read about it is the official
> definition of valid CSS syntax.
not necessarily, which is why i asked. ive read far too much
documentation and not known the assumed particulars in order to get
some things work. not talking css here, but programming syntax in
general.
but, let me ask -- whats the point of being a dick? if you dont want to
help me, then dont. let someone else...
matt
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|