|
|
Posted by Dr John Stockton on 09/19/06 12:26
JRS: In article <450caef2$0$33171$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net>,
dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:41:52 remote, seen in news:comp.infosystems.ww
w.authoring.html, Number 11950 - GPEMC! Replace number with 11950
<number@fieldcraft.biz> posted :
>
>Frames mess up your accessibility and search engine rankings - even the
>noframes content is largely ignored in my experience. Google for "Different
>and yet indifferent", then have a look at www.fieldcraft.biz/topics
Naive statement.
Frame capability is harmless.
Forcing frames is deleterious.
A site can be designed to be fully usable without frames, but also to
have, at the reader's request, an index (or other) frame. See via sig
line 3.
It's a good idea to read the newsgroup and its FAQ.
--
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v4.00 IE 4 ©
<URL:http://www.jibbering.com/faq/>? JL/RC: FAQ of news:comp.lang.javascript
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|