|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 10/04/06 15:48
Joel Shepherd wrote:
> Sure it's a test. It's repeatable, it's verifiable, it answered a
> well-defined question with a yes/no answer:
It didn't answer the question being asked though. The question wasn't,
"Does there exist one valid page which retains validity after FP ?" it
was "Does FP ever change pages?" Although you carefully post a valid
re-hash of Karl Popper, it still doesn't fix FP. This test is just too
narrow in scope to be a valid comparison for the reasonable purposes of
informal dialogue. It's _certainly_ too narrow to be a valid test for a
magazine article review.
> But it would take _only one_ test to prove that FP sometimes twists
> valid into invalid markup. Feel free to demonstrate it.
Send me a copy of current FP and I'd be interested enough to examine
it. I'm not interested enough to buy one though.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|