|
|
Posted by Chris F.A. Johnson on 10/12/06 17:09
On 2006-10-12, John Dunlop wrote:
> dorayme:
>
> [re overcoming e-mail address obfuscation]
>
> And, as I've explained, the techniques to obfuscate e-mail addresses
> proposed in this thread run contrary to the spirit of Internet
> specifications. That a construct is included in a specification is
> hardly license to exploit it.
As NtS pointed out, that's not true (or, at least, debatable).
> Deal with spam at your end; don't pass the buck.
That's what obfuscate e-mail addresses do. Letting spam be
generated any more than necessary is passing the buck. The
important thing it to prevent it (as much as possible) in the first
place.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|