|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/13/06 12:17
John Dunlop wrote:
> Koncept:
>
>
>>[Cerebral Believer:]
>>
>>
>>>Is this a good ereg statement?
>
>
> No. The pattern tries to weed out malformed e-mail addresses but fails
> because it is too restrictive. A regular expression to match all
> well-formed e-mail addresses would be complex, since in addition to the
> productions you would need to include from RFC2822, the pattern would
> involve recursion of a subpattern if it was to allow comments.
>
>
>>Try this:
>
>
> A prime bogosity indicator on Usenet.
>
I did see a regex which would handle all possible addresses. Don't
remember where I saw it off hand, but it was around 6500 chars long.
Obviously it's not easy to validate email addresses!
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|