|
|
Posted by ato_zee on 10/15/06 06:28
On 15-Oct-2006, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> > The creator of CSE HTML "Validator" has argued speciously on Usenet as
> > to why he calls his application a "validator" despite the fact that it
> > isn't one under the technical definition of the word.
It's an imperfect world. Editors can generate code that validates, but doesn't
work, W3C validator can miss some things. Some browsers work with
some pages and not others.
Personally I use W3C validator at the design stage, and CSE validator
at the end to see if it picks up anything I've missed.
DW8 is useful for some things, to see nesting/layout, find orphened
files, check links, but it doesn't pick up a lot of errors.
So I code in a text editor.
There is no single tool that does everything.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|