|
|
Posted by David Dorward on 12/05/06 23:36
Kerrie M. Meyers wrote:
> I like to SAX more ? it's better with multiple interfaces and funcions
> to process a xml file.
You like SAX more than ... what? (and there are SAX implementations
available for PHP and for some JavaScript implementations).
> with jscript you go nowhere outof java, so why not SAX then ?
Now I'm confused.
First - why bring JScript into this? If you mean JavaScript then please note
that JScript refers to the Microsoft implementation of the language.
Second - Java? Nobody has mentioned anything relating to Java yet. The
closest that the thread has come so far is JavaScript (which has four
things in common with Java - the first four letters of its name).
> not including it is completely microsoft specific, you will never be able
> to use jscript in linux or macos.
No, but you can use JavaScript. The differences aren't really all that
significant.
> With SAX you can handle nodes tree in many ways, i don't know about PHP,
> but it seems unable to compare with SAX, and only works in some platforms.
You can use SAX parsers from PHP.
> Such limitations should be considered. I have been in java field for over
> 20 years, and done many industrial applications,.
Java has been around for slightly more then a decade. It isn't possible to
have been in the Java field for 20 years.
--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|