|
|
Posted by fullposter on 12/14/06 00:08
But no Jukka: when I want to insult someone I don't do like that: i do
like: hey you cunt motherfucker what ahbout sucking some cock and
swallowing?
Now, that is insulting.
Only kids get insulted by "many times quality isn't high". Come on, you
credit me with little if you think that all I copuld be capable of when
at insulting was that.
If I meant to insult you, you couldn't finish reading for other
reasons... lol
You got bothered exactly at the line where the topic started, the last
you quote:
" Let's make this short review."
Let's say the truth Jukka: you are here not to select the topics you
like and contribute, but just to focus on as much as you find necessary
to find an argument. And that's ALL you are interested in.
So you can take my word, if I meant to insult you, you would feel
insulted indeed.
The attention span of the readers is not my concern. I am actually not
addressing guys like you. I am addressing those who may like having a
bit of leisure time and, with calm, enjoy reading posts. Also, guys
intelligent enough that they know one can skip a line or two
occasionally.
You jnow we are in the hamburgers times: all want to get the point
soon, and end up as fat as baloons.
My post is not for you Jukka. It is clearly for those who may want to
read 5 minutes.
If you are such a busy man that you can't read finve minutes, how comes
you find 4 to write a reply o that you are attending a newsgroup at
all?
Let's forget about it: I said quality is many times low, let's say it
is almost always low. Guys like you and the other are the confirmation.
Just a mistake guys, I should have remembered that if one wants a
slightly more sophisticated intellectual discussion, one should not ask
to you oin the first place.
Good hamburger. And I won't follow the discussion any longer, sorry to
have wasted MY time hoping there could be one normal person in here
able to read 5 minutes. The last time you read a book was at school
wasn't it?
Newsgroups: a place for losers as ignorant as a stone. A mistake, never
mind.
Good bye, morons
Jukka K. Korpela ha scritto:
> Scripsit fullposter:
>
> > [not native english speaker speaking, ok? - i posted also to another
> > group being unsure whether html.critics was more appropriate and yet
> > less read than this - so 2 posts on the whole]
> >
> > Although it may appear speculative, and although i do not put any
> > particular trust in newsgroups (meaning that most of the times the
> > quality is not very high, but of course one goes for the few good
> > posts that may be there), I have a topic that maybe could be of some
> > relative interest.
> >
> > Let's make this short review.
>
> You spent the 15 seconds attention span that you typically get, at best,
> from an average reader. At this point, you haven't said a single word about
> the subject matter of your message, still less formulated a single statement
> about it.
>
> You did manage to insult some people, though.
>
> There's an HTML-related lesson to be learned. People write web pages quite
> often as you wrote your message - without even trying to get to the point
> during the precious few seconds that you can reasonably expect people to
> look at your message.
>
> There's good old advice on writing a column (for a newspaper or equivalent):
> start writing, and finish at the end of the paper, then cut off the first
> half and throw it away; then work on the remaining text (usually making it
> shorter, among other things). This might, with due modifications, be used
> when creating short web page, and also when writing a Usenet message that
> you regard as important.
>
> So get to the point early. Otherwise there's no reader left when you start
> getting to the point.
>
> --
> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|