|
|
Posted by dorayme on 12/21/06 22:20
In article <slrneom1ee.bl7.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
> On 2006-12-21, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> [snip]
> > I would say it [hiding HTML source code if you could] is a bad idea
> > generally for similar reasons to those that make it a good idea to
> > have open source programs. But there are arguments both ways on this
> > issue. It may be that companies would put more effort into development
> > if their operations were not quite so open.
>
> It's often the opposite though. There are a lot of companies whose
> "mission critical" products you wouldn't dream of buying if you'd seen
> the ball of mud source code they were compiled from.
Yes, this is a point!
Slightly similar but not as bad: I'd hate to let a client see my
duffing about making their website, they would surely lose
confidence.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|