|
|
Posted by Joel Shepherd on 12/23/06 17:51
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> And the argument now is very simple, if A has a property that B
> does not have, A cannot be B.
So, a cat is a mammal, with specific attributes that not all mammals
have. Same for a llama. A cat is not a llama. But are you saying that a
cat is not a mammal? Or that anywhere a mammal is required, neither a
cat nor a llama will do? By your very simple definition, that would seem
to be the case.
> And there are many properties - ah
> ah! Ed! No ifs and buts, look! - that are obviously different, in
> the two (note "two") windows, the browser and the source text.
Well ... yeah. What of it?
--
Joel.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|