Posted by Paul Furman on 01/04/07 18:33

I've had this web site up for years and I don't know maybe a couple
years ago i added a more advanced php driven system under edgehill.net/1
many of the images are annotated or at least the title gives an
indication of the location and date. I just did a test and was able to
find a keyword under the new /1 section but google images doesn't see it
at all. The problem I think is the galleries are set up as subfolders
and the php files format the gallery so I've got all these indexless
folders which are basically garbage for a web browser:

What should look like this:
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/Oakland/2005-11-05-pinehurst>
Is indexed like this:
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/California/Bay-Area/Oakland/2005-11-05-pinehurst/>

On my other baynatives site I added a line in the longest irrelevant
page to prevent indexing that like such:
<meta name='googlebot' content='noarchive, noindex'>
and that works like a charm but the edgehill.net site as far as I know
does not directly point to these nested content folder except in the php
address [?SC=go.php&DIR=]

I'm not opposed to people viewing raw directories, sometimes that's
useful to point to an image or file without all the formatting but I
don't want them indexed in search engines.

Any Advice?

--
Paul Furman
Bay Natives Nursery
http://www.baynatives.com
Photography
http://www.edgehill.net/1
(415) 722-6037

• Next in forum: Re: Why aren't key strokes being recognized when a certain table row has focus?
• Prev in forum: Re: table row heights
• Thread view: robots.txt

[Reply to this message]