|
|
Posted by Max Grrl on 01/13/07 20:02
In article <pan.2007.01.13.18.15.43.22352@my.shorts.org>, JM
<eat.me@my.shorts.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:14:17 +0000, ThePsyko wrote:
>
> > On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Max Grrl cry
> > out in news:120120071705421741%maxtheangel@gmail.com...
> >
> >> In article <4LTph.21$9M6.1@newsfe03.lga>, Steve <no.one@example.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "ThePsyko" <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:Xns98B683A55608LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> >>> | On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve
> >>> | cry out in news:BoSph.34$US6.2@newsfe02.lga...
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> | > "Bill K" <msuwkrull@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> | > news:1168617886.958531.250160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >>> | >|
> >>> | >| Steve wrote:
> >>> | >| > "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
> >>> | >| > message news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com...
> >>> | >| > | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a search
> >>> | >| > | for something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog hit
> >>> | >| > | after blog hit.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > <snip>
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM
> >>> | >| > !!! i
> >>> | > program
> >>> | >| > in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're
> >>> | >| > describing. further, i have several technical hobbies as well.
> >>> | >| > each are well covered
> >>> | > in
> >>> | >| > blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude and
> >>> | > assertions,
> >>> | >| > i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably
> >>> | >| > certain
> >>> | > that
> >>> | >| > someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged source
> >>> | >| > sites...
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine. I
> >>> | >| > HATE DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in nntp
> >>> | >| > groups whos context is specific, and specifically NOT for such
> >>> | >| > tirades!
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > now, on to your quotes...
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | Hatter Quotes
> >>> | >| > | -------------
> >>> | >| > | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one
> >>> | >| > | of the best."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve such
> >>> | >| > a title
> >>> | > of
> >>> | >| > being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly
> >>> | >| > had for
> >>> | > it.
> >>> | >| > rather, they are those with a natural disposition on inclination
> >>> | >| > toward
> >>> | > the
> >>> | >| > same.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch
> >>> | >| > | slapped you with it."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the
> >>> | > majority...i
> >>> | >| > wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the
> >>> | >| > conflict
> >>> | > between
> >>> | >| > our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as to
> >>> | >| > prompt
> >>> | > you
> >>> | >| > to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no
> >>> | >| > indication as
> >>> | > to
> >>> | >| > whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such work.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > i thought your arrogance was.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself the
> >>> | >| > fuck
> >>> | > up'
> >>> | >| > since you cannot discipline your own tongue.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews,
> >>> | >| > | my bad."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking
> >>> | >| > anti-semite.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n
> >>> | >| > | such...mmmm..."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad
> >>> | >| > it illuminates nothing.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different from
> >>> | >| > the
> >>> | > world
> >>> | >| > in which you delude yourself.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful
> >>> | >| > | stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to
> >>> | >| > | further my art?"
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally
> >>> | >| > acceptable
> >>> | > to
> >>> | >| > the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to be
> >>> | >| > known
> >>> | > as
> >>> | >| > the art definitive of 'perfect ass'.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social
> >>> | >| > | construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to
> >>> | >| > | convince others of its relevancy."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which
> >>> | >| > means that
> >>> | > i
> >>> | >| > perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving that
> >>> | >| > you do...and you give little cause that would 'convince others'.
> >>> | >| > after all, based on your blathering, narcisistic, and
> >>> | >| > hatefulness behaviour there
> >>> | > is
> >>> | >| > very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be a
> >>> | >| > waste of time. consider the cost/benefit ratio.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun
> >>> | >| > | and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the
> >>> | >| > | champagne proper."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > said your boyfriend on new years eve.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party
> >>> | >| > observations. even personal reality is kept in check...tried
> >>> | >| > levitating lately?
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think
> >>> | >| > | that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like
> >>> | >| > | they're just givin em out for free."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are
> >>> | >| > even more pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade
> >>> | >| > around, completely
> >>> | > obvious
> >>> | >| > to all others, without a single marble in your bag.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of
> >>> | >| > | quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and
> >>> | >| > | decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little
> >>> | >| > | mess."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > which is why i'm now plonking you.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
> >>> | >| > | horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they
> >>> | >| > | violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the
> >>> | >| > | faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who
> >>> | >| > | will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny
> >>> | >| > | little minds'."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be good
> >>> | >| > to
> >>> | > start
> >>> | >| > with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to
> >>> | >| > use angels
> >>> | > for
> >>> | >| > support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he
> >>> | >| > has/needs
> >>> | > angels.
> >>> | >| > further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood,
> >>> | >| > and have a fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable
> >>> | >| > imagery in ones head.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and
> >>> | >| > 'earth shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals
> >>> | >| > curtail partaking
> >>> | > of
> >>> | >| > the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the
> >>> | >| > group -
> >>> | > spelling
> >>> | >| > a most certain doom.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't
> >>> | >| > | even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone whom
> >>> | >| > you've
> >>> | > never
> >>> | >| > met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find
> >>> | >| > it
> >>> | > necessary
> >>> | >| > to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your
> >>> | >| > judging of
> >>> | > style
> >>> | >| > is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously
> >>> | >| > overvalue
> >>> | > everything
> >>> | >| > you do.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Those who record history are those who control history."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a
> >>> | >| > negative
> >>> | > light.
> >>> | >| > this assertion assumes that motive records history and that the
> >>> | >| > events
> >>> | > of
> >>> | >| > history have little effect on the story.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its
> >>> | >| > | tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and
> >>> | >| > | unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for
> >>> | >| > | you."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that
> >>> | >| > endeavor,
> >>> | > bring
> >>> | >| > it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
> >>> | >| > | tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's my
> >>> | >| > quote: 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your way'.
> >>> | >| > since you have no such art, or even tact, i can see why this
> >>> | >| > scenario has plagued your
> >>> | > mind
> >>> | >| > and why you'd consider it an ideal situation.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> |>| > | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
> >>> | >| > | function?"
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning!
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
> >>> | >| > | Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the
> >>> | >| > | forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users."
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every
> >>> | >| > one of
> >>> | > these
> >>> | >| > groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to 'participate'
> >>> | >| > in one
> >>> | > of
> >>> | >| > them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you
> >>> | >| > cannot get
> >>> | > any
> >>> | >| > more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to
> >>> | > increase'...i
> >>> | >| > don't think you mean to be so optimistic.
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > | "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
> >>> | >| > | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > and here's my injunctive relief...
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > *PLONK*
> >>> | >| >
> >>> | >| > now, FOAD.
> >>> | >|
> >>> | >| Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people to
> >>> | >| spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have such
> >>> | >| power. Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them to use
> >>> | >| their creative energy solving problems such as Iraq instead
> >>> | >| diatribes against you, imagine what could be accomplished. --
> >>> | >| A Hatter Fan
> >>> | >
> >>> | > bill is hatter. pretty sad when one rants, is confronted, and runs
> >>> | > and hides under a new identity. and, my response took all of about
> >>> | > 5 minutes. i had it to spare while my pc was compiling some code.
> >>> | > go spew your stupidity somewhere else.
> >>> | >
> >>> | > FOAD
> >>> | >
> >>> | >
> >>> | >
> >>> | >
> >>> | lol... You're new to usenet aren't you...
> >>
> >> Obviously, Babe. : )
> >>> |
> >>> | --
> >>> | ThePsyko
> >>> | Public Enemy #7
> >>>
> >>> the sock strikes again.
> >>
> >> LOL, Psycho's not Hat's sock - nor anyone else's.
> >>
> >>> you have heard of statistical significance, haven't you? first, what
> >>> are the odds that someone favors your vanity, stupidity, and
> >>> narcissism? second, that three of them would follow you into one of
> >>> these three news groups?
> >>
> >> I've got an idea - why don't you take a looky-look at all the froups
> >> this thread is xposted to, hmmm? Considering that there's at least 4,
> >> that's quite a few pools to draw peeps from.
> >>
> >> Further, when you consider the fact that most of these peeps have been
> >> on usenet for quite some time, I'd think it's pretty fucking logical to
> >> come to the conclusion that pretty much everybody KNOWS pretty much
> >> everybody.
> >>
> >> But for the record, the players are from the froups as follows (though,
> >> next time, why don't you just Google the chit to see if they ARE socks
> >> before you start ASSuming shit, hmmm?
> >>
> >> Psycho: alt.hackers.malicious, alt.2600 (I think), alt.php (I think)
> >> Hat: All of the above
> >> Me: ADG, AHM, though I often lurk at AMF
> >>
> >> For the record, I've known Hat for about 2 years, and Psycho about what?
> >> 6 months? And no one who's actually lurked for longer than a week would
> >> EVER assume that the two are anything close to even being friendly, much
> >> less "socks" of the other, LOL.
> >>
> >>> third, that they would find your post among a myriad of other posts not
> >>> made by you? and four, that they all have the same cantor, tone,
> >>> daftness, and arrogance in the voice of their posts as you? i know you
> >>> lack such critical thinking skills or familiarity with mathematics in
> >>> general, however don't assume the rest of us are so gullible.
> >>
> >> AFAIK, the syntax you're referring to would be considered a "language"
> >> common to those who hack and/or are "netters."LOL, I'm by no means a
> >> hacker, but I speak the "language" for the most part . . . it's kinda
> >> how you fit in in the groups.
> >>
> >> And if you haven't figured it out yet - most hackers are fucking
> >> arrogant as hell - prolly because they know they can fuck up your
> >> computer without breaking a sweat. But, "netters" are pretty fucking
> >> arrogant, too.
> >>>
> >>> i expect, if you have any honesty in you, you should just respond to
> >>> this reply with the name 'sockMaster'.
> >>
> >> HTH!!
> >>
> >> *sigh*
> >>
> >> I know, I know . . . I MUST be a sock, too, right? ; )
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > yeah but you're a cute sock lol.. now.. where do I put my toes IYKWIM?!??
> > :)
>
> "How can I take you seriously with a little pink sock in your mouth?"
> ;p
LOL, no one has EVER used the color "pink" in reference to me!! : )
Black or green are more my colors. : )
But mainly black.
--
Max Grrl
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|