|
|
Posted by jitter on 01/15/07 04:07
In article <DHCqh.277$Je6.210@newsfe02.lga>, no.one@example.com says...
>
> "The Secretary of HomIntern" <YkR4N53909@WòéM.6Ró> wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.01.15.01.54.56.104463@bisexuals.for.lgbt.freedom...
> | On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:18:23 -0600, Steve k'lamed:
> | > "Pinku-Sensei" wrote...
> | > | Max Grrl wrote:
> | > | > ThePsyko wrote:
> | > | >> On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard
> Onideus
> | > | >> Mad Hatter cry out...
> | > |
> | > | >> > So I guess the question now is...who wants to nominate Stevie The
> | > | >> > Wonder Retard for CNotM?
> | > |
> | > | You forgot to tell them to include AUK in the groups line when they
> did.
> | > | Since you can't nominate candidates yourself, you're going to have to
> | > | give better instructions to those who can.
> | > |
> | > | >> I think the simple act of assuming you and I are the same person is
> | > | >> definitely worthy of a "clueless" award of any magnitude..
> | > |
> | > | That /is/ pretty st00pid. Anyone with a clue would know better. I
> | > | guess Hatter hasn't been poasting to alt.php long enough for the
> | > | regulars there (or alt.atheism) to figure that out.
> | >
> | > not stupid really. i was overly optimistic in assuming there were fewer
> | > kooks in the world so self-absorbed as omh. in my hopeful perspective
> and
> | > seeing other responses supporting the original kook, i assumed it was a
> | > sock. likewise, i felt (and still do) that for the conversation at hand,
> | > an attempt to verify this assumption by inspecting headers simply was/is
> | > not a very good use of my time. now, if that is 'st00pid', i'm sorry no
> | > one understands. however, i don't care. when i'm in a news group aimed
> at
> | > harboring stupidity or asinine and egotistical content, i may become
> more
> | > interested and take the time. as it is, the ng i'm responding from is
> | > geared to solving programmatic problems...not listening to or responding
> | > to blog-fashioned rants of personal opinion that have nothing to do with
> | > really much of anything other than the action of doing so.
> | >
> | > as for the 'award', i'd nominate omh. by shear and utter demonstration
> of
> | > narcisism and lack of any measure of logical response to his assertions
> i
> | > commented on, he has the corner on the definition of kook. he's a
> shoe-in.
> | > i can't help but feel, though, that those relishing such awards
> | > (nominations and conveyences) that it is an exercise of mental
> | > masturbation on a monumental scale more closely resembling public, forum
> | > sponsered group sex. what purpose does this serve and what good is
> | > derived? i'm sure it is better understood by the other 12 yr. old
> 'l33ts'
> | > from alt.2600 - omh being its pennicle mascot. as for we more matured
> | > useneters, we simply have better and more productive ways to spend our
> | > time.
> | >
> | > cheers
> |
> | OMH is already a multiple award-winning k00k, and giving him anymore
> | awards only feeds his ego. You, however, are new blood, and I think a
> | CNotM nomination, as well as a Unabomber Surprise, would look good on
> | you. Sadly, I can't give you either nom, as I've already used them up
> | (on equally-as-worthy candidates, mind), but I can at least make
> | suggestions.
>
> now see...that's funny. ;^)
>
> since i'm obviously new to such 'awards', perhaps you'd be so kind as to
> de-achronymize them and give a brief description. that may provide me with a
> few more chuckles.
>
> cheers.
FYI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt.usenet.kooks
A word to the wise: Hide behind a web proxy before visiting any of the
external links listed at the bottom of the page.
BTW, you don't seem to be a kook, at least on the same level as most of
the other fucking freaks that appear in AUK. Not even close. You just
didn't check headers before yelling "sockpuppet" at ThePsycho and making
a fool of yourself. BFD. Everybody makes mistakes. Mistakes are
actually good, because that's how people learn. Fatty Matty only
suggested one of those dumb awards because he thought it would start a
big to-do. (Looks like he guessed right. You and all those other
idiots that took him seriously have been trolled.)
Suggestion: Clip AUK and A2600 from the group list, and settle back in
alt.php or alt.design.graphics. You'll probably be happier for it, in
the long run. Follow-ups set, for your convenience, but I'm sure some
asshole will try to troll you into continuing to xpost to AUK.
Bye. Have a nice life.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|