|
|
Posted by the red dot on 01/15/07 23:28
"aa" <a@aa.com> wrote in message
news:45ac014b$0$8726$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
>
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> ΣΟΟΒέΙΜ/ΣΟΟΒέΙΜΑ Χ ΞΟΧΟΣΤΡΘ
> ΣΜΕΔΥΐέΕΕ:
> news:doraymeRidThis-DF7BCE.07280316012007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > Your website is basically pictures? You are set on this course?
>
> I realise the downsides of this design and usually do not use it. This
time
> I just got this set of graphics, and being absolute zero in graphic
design,
> I had to select this option.
> I plan to have two css files, one for 800x600 and the other for 1024x760,
> and set all the images locations and scales in these css. Then using JS
will
> select a css depending on screen.width property.
> BTW on 800x600 I had to sca;e down all the graphics, so on 1024x760 it
will
> be used as is without scaling up, so the quality should preserve.
> Also because the target audience of this site are companies in
entrtainment
> business, I do not expect them to have problems with bandwidth. I even
think
> that for this type of audience I do not need 800x600 at all.
>
im 1280x1024 should i change my screen resolution when viewing your site?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|