|
|
Posted by fuli open on 02/03/07 03:19
On Feb 2, 3:40 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article
> <1170422456.170208.152...@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "fuli open" <fulio...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 1, 5:17 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > > "The expert advice is to use HTML 4.01, but you can of course use
> > > > > technobabble-XHTML _if_ you are careful enough to follow
> > > > > guidelines that effectively make it HTML 4.01 with pointless
> > > > > kludges."
>
> > Also, which language do html professionals like better, xhtml or html
> > 4.01? As an amateur, following suit is the best policy.
>
> Just use HTML 4.01.
I tested my home page with html 4 strict on the html validator, and
was told as follows:
quote
No Character Encoding Found! Falling back to UTF-8.
This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Strict!
unquote
In fact, I tested all the three headings, xhtml, html transitional and
html strict, but was told that my page was not valid any. And if the
page is not valid for any heading, do I still need to put a heading
there? Will the heading hurt the page?
The URL of the tested page is: www.pinyinology.com
Thanks for help.
fuli open
>
> --
> dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|