|
|
Posted by dorayme on 03/06/07 00:22
In article <9880c$45eca845$40cba77e$12258@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In article <456f4$45ec4a13$40cba77e$13679@NAXS.COM>,
> > "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
> > I think PDFs, generally, will be bigger than HTMLS. But given a
> > client, for example, might want to be making a PDF available (to
> > save cost of paying for proper integration into a website and
> > other reasons), the client can often make PDFs smaller than they
> > do.
> >
>
> Strip it down all you want, there is a very noticeable difference on
> dialup! At least well done flash can stream.
I will make my point yet again. There is a difference in size
between a big PDF and a small PDF. And you can apply this truth
to whatever comparisons or advice you want to give. For example,
if anyone is worried about the download times of a PDF, they can
consider a number of things. One of them is making it smaller. It
is not absolutely the most important alternative. But it is one
of them.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|