|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 03/08/07 12:55
On Mar 8, 11:41 pm, Jeff <dont_bug...@all.uk> wrote:
> Chaddy2222 wrote:
> > "Chaddy2222" <m...@me.me> wrote in message news:...
>
> >>Hi all.
> >>I was wondering if I could get a bit of feedback / comment on the
> >>following layout.http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc/temp/testtemplate
> >>Thanks.
>
> Well, no complaints about the html but... and I don't know where this
> started at...
>
> Too many color families. And they don't mix well!
>
> IE6 does not get the flow pattern and shows the content below the nav.
>
> In all browsers I checked the widths are like a mismatched stack of
> boxes. Using *a* table to structure a layout has it's uses. When it
> comes right down to it, your clients will care more about how tidy the
> site looks rather than how tidy the html is. Your call, but with modern
> complex layouts tableless is an advanced art. Not that with this simple
> layout you shouldn't be able to go tableless, but you are not there yet!
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> >>--
> >>Regards Chad.
> >>http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
>
> > Hi all, I kind of was in a horry before and forgot to give my post a proper
> > subject line. So there it is again.- Hide quoted text -
>
Umm did you not READ THE PREVIOUS POST!.
I am well aware of the issue with IE (hence why I need to get the
other CSS working for it. It's is not my problem that Microsoft do not
follow proper web standards. It's a CSS support issue, the layout
works ok in FF2 and Opera. Well a lot better then in IE anyway.
It's also only in beta form, check out my main site for a better
looking page (though it will look better in FF then IE, cause IE is a
bit shit, though IE7 is a bit less shit. In fact I don't IE7, but I
can't use it as it does not work with my screne reading software.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|