|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 03/08/07 14:59
On Mar 8, 11:55 pm, "Chaddy2222" <spamlovermailbox-
sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Mar 8, 11:41 pm, Jeff <dont_bug...@all.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Chaddy2222 wrote:
> > > "Chaddy2222" <m...@me.me> wrote in message news:...
>
> > >>Hi all.
> > >>I was wondering if I could get a bit of feedback / comment on the
> > >>following layout.http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc/temp/testtemplate
> > >>Thanks.
>
> > Well, no complaints about the html but... and I don't know where this
> > started at...
>
> > Too many color families. And they don't mix well!
>
> > IE6 does not get the flow pattern and shows the content below the nav.
>
> > In all browsers I checked the widths are like a mismatched stack of
> > boxes. Using *a* table to structure a layout has it's uses. When it
> > comes right down to it, your clients will care more about how tidy the
> > site looks rather than how tidy the html is. Your call, but with modern
> > complex layouts tableless is an advanced art. Not that with this simple
> > layout you shouldn't be able to go tableless, but you are not there yet!
>
> > Jeff
>
> > >>--
> > >>Regards Chad.
> > >>http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
>
> > > Hi all, I kind of was in a horry before and forgot to give my post a proper
> > > subject line. So there it is again.- Hide quoted text -
>
> Umm did you not READ THE PREVIOUS POST!.
> I am well aware of the issue with IE (hence why I need to get the
> other CSS working for it. It's is not my problem that Microsoft do not
> follow proper web standards. It's a CSS support issue, the layout
> works ok in FF2 and Opera. Well a lot better then in IE anyway.
> It's also only in beta form, check out my main site for a better
> looking page (though it will look better in FF then IE, cause IE is a
> bit shit, though IE7 is a bit less shit. In fact I don't IE7, but I
> can't use it as it does not work with my screne reading software.
Umm I think I ment to say there that I like IE7. Though I prefer Opera
and FireFox.
I am still not sure what's wrong with the conditional comments I am
useing though. Any suggestions?
Thanks.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|