|
|
Posted by Steve on 03/08/07 21:17
| >it is the way in which he uses any given technology. he clearly
| >has no depth of understanding of any he employs...that includes flash -
|
| Oh yes, I clearly have no depth of understanding...you know, except
| for all those bleeding edge Flash sites I keep churning out:
| http://www.backwater-productions.net/RMXP_CSG/
|
| Boy, reality sure is a bitch for you, innt Stevie?
that's 'bleeding edge'? if reality is a bitch for me, then how much more out
of your grasp is it for you...given your reality of 'bleeding edge'. lol.
| >don't confuse 'the most important' with 'the most popular'. THE MOST
| >important developing web technology is STILL XML.
|
| ...uh, XML isn't even REMOTELY the most important web technology...in
| fact it's pretty much the LEAST important since all it is, is a poor
| mans database. It's basically like...a database for dummies. ^_^
ur funny. you just put an exlamation point on your own stupidity. you
obviously have no idea what, nor how xml is used and how extensively as
well.
| >as for me 'playing catch up', i program in six different languages
| >professionally and have done so since the 80's.
|
| Stevie is probably referring to like Basic, Cobol, Fortran, Pascal,
| DOS batch scripting and Prolog. LOL
c, c++, c#, tcl/tk, plc, .net, php...and yes, cobol and fortran - and
there's nothing wrong with either.
| >i am confident i can learn
| >any language.
|
| ...um, why would you need to "learn" a language, I mean, fucking
| hello, that's what reference manuals are for. Geez, what kind of a
| doorknob would actually take the stupidity to commit an entire
| programming languages syntax to memory?! o_O
you're a goof. you obviously an not a quick study nor do you have an
aptitude for language. none are strikingly different than the next. learn
one, and subsequent languages become more easily learned.
oh, and the reason a person would 'learn' something is so that one can
master its application.
| If you tried to do that, by the time you actually had it all
| down...the language would be obsolete and you wouldn't even be able to
| make use of it.
only if you are projecting again. the REST of us can 'learn' a new language
in less than three weeks. funny how you've been programming flash for much
longer yet have very little to show for it. perhaps because you are so
against 'learning'.
| >'playing catch up' is EXACTLY what should be done.
|
| No, it REALLY shouldn't...well unless you want to be an UNPRODUCING
| fuckwit like yourself maybe. There's a reason you have a vast poverty
| of work to show for your knowledge, Stevie...try and guess why.
well, you can talk to bmw, toyota, porche, carfax, lockheed-martin, bell
helicopter, bnsf, and a host of others whom all enjoy and have profitted
from my 'poverty of work'. or, you could just come and check out my houses,
cars, and my boat. payday is great!
;^)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|