|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 03/13/07 05:02
dorayme wrote:
> In article <87b8b$45f629cf$40cba785$3018@NAXS.COM>,
> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
>>> And, the subject of my post, do you provide a fallback link as
>>> well?
>> No but a sent in multi-format with a text only fallback. If they have
>> trouble I send images by attachment. Most of the time I don't have to.
>> Beats dealing with old AOLers that were also restricted to a single
>> attachment! Then if your had more than one image your had to zip them up
>> first!
>
> So now that you have seen what the font crowd do, would you
> consider such a strategy?
>
If I was doing a mailing list type email, an announcement to many
patrons, yes. Just a one-to-one for a simple approval email, no.
Still on dialup (not by choice) Uploading a page just to support an
email would be a PITA. Now I do do it when the 'review' requires
graphics too large for a typical email. Then I build a temp page and
send a link in an email. SMTP bloats binary data so it is never a good
transport from large size binary content.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|