|
|
Posted by unknownking321 on 03/13/07 19:36
Thank you for your help. It was a stupid mistake which I should learn
from.
Thanks again.
On 13 Mar, 19:29, Els <els.aNOS...@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> unknownking...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > On 13 Mar, 18:57, Els <els.aNOS...@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> >> unknownking...@googlemail.com wrote:
> >>> Can someone please tell me why my site which is in its early stage:
> >>> [url]http://www.geocities.com/bhavikdhokia/newindex.htm[/url]
>
> >>> is formatted very differently when viewed in Internet Explorer and
> >>> Firefox?
>
> >>> I don't want it to be like either. When viewed, before uploading it
> >>> to Geocities, it looks like this:
> >>> [URL=http://img408.imageshack.us/my.php?image=websitevt1.jpg]
> >>> [IMG]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/2969/websitevt1.th.jpg[/IMG][/
> >>> URL]
>
> >>> and that's how I want it displayed once uploaded.
>
> >> I think you should carefully compare the code that resulted in the
> >> image you posted, with the code that is uploaded to the geocities
> >> server. I bet the code you have at home doesn't have "width: 536px;
> >> height: 31px" set for <div id="header">. (hint: the image with the
> >> word "header" in it, won't fit in the 536x31 header, as it is 137px
> >> high and 710px wide)
>
> > Still when viewed in Firefox, the image doesn't fit the header.
> > However, when viewed in Firefox, the image is really small, smaller
> > than the header.
>
> It does that in Firefox and in IE6. It's what you tell it to do now
> that you've set the height and width of the image to be 536px and
> 31px. What did you expect it would do then?
>
> --
> Els http://locusmeus.com/
> accessible web design: http://locusoptimus.com/
>
> Now playing: Tom Petty - Honeybee
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|