|
Posted by Czapi on 03/16/07 09:21
Erwin Moller wrote:
> You can even store the results of a query in the database if you want, and
> just update that when needed (= when the underlying data changes).
Yes, but memcache is a lot faster than any SQL engine. The only thing
that could match the speed would be a memory storage engine as
implemented in MySQL - for simple pkey indexing I think it still
couldn't match memcache.
So RDBS gives you much more flexibility and scalability but at the cost
of complexity you might not need.
However in this case I would go for MySQL + memory storage engine.
--
Cz.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|