|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 03/30/07 18:39
On 30 Mar, 18:25, "cluthz" <WHATEEVVE...@by.co.uk> wrote:
> The site has been received very well when we test it on people
"No one complained while we stood over them for a few minutes"
with a dash of
"People who hate it simply leave without comment"
I don't believe that you did "test" it, or that your study group was
in any way representative. No-one does this -- it's too expensive.
Yes, I have done it. Very rarely, and only in hugely expensive
usability trials I just can't afford to run very often.
> we use it as an example of what can be done and people respond very positively.
or "I am right"
> As for examples of websites that don't look good, well actually it is often
> the websites to whcih the tutorials are on that actually put me off.
or "You're all wrong"
> I do not want to give any examples as I would not want to offend
or "I have no real evidence to support my prejudices"
> I do accept the example I have given most probably could have been done
> better.
or "It's complete crap with any variance in font size, for a trivial
site that could be entirely re-written in a few minutes"
> Fortunletly it works well at the moment
For you. Not for everyone.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|