|
|
Posted by dorayme on 04/02/07 06:38
In article <FvCdnfIEeppa4o3bnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
Kevin Scholl <kscholl@comcast.DELETE.net> wrote:
> I suppose my wonder with your examples
> above are with the classification of a "smallish" file being 800x600. I
> was expecting something more akin to, say, an interface button, maybe
> 120x30 or something like that. 800x600 is hardly "smallish" IMHO.
Oh... by "smallish" I was referring to comparative file size, not
actual width and height in pxs. I often prepare both thumbnails
and enlargements and their dimensions are fixed. What is needed
is quality at the min file size and that is what the discussion
has been touching on. The most recent task I did, the thumbs were
7k to 12k (and nice useful ones like 200 x 150 pxs) and 33 to 95k
for the biggest enlargements of 800 x 600.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|