|
|
Posted by dorayme on 04/08/07 22:06
In article <34885$4618c74a$40cba7c3$8225@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
>
> > is enough acknowledgement. Or does JL want more details? And if I
> > use your idea, you want me to say "Bootnic"?
> >
>
> <blush> Enough acknowledgment, I was just interested the the puzzle...
in that case, be thankful that your name did not figure in
flashing lights on the website proper instead of in a comment in
a linked js file which only geeks will see! <g>
I adapted your js for some portait thumbs (150 wide by 200 wide)
and this worked well in IE. So too a page where I have thumbnails
for movies, strips of about 530 wide (yes, looks good and 2 such
thumbs can get onto a big screen and be centered nicely). But not
so good on 200 x 150 landscape thumb page. If you really want to
see, email me, this particular set is a bit private. Otherwise
simply use the bare bones thumb page url I made at beginning of
thread and use 200 x 150.
Bootnic's js code works on Bootnic's url. To adapt I will
consider things. Yours was nice and simple and did not alter my
css so much and so was easier to adapt. I have no idea how much
his depends on his margin and paddings till I try.
Truth is, all this is a bit of an exercise for me too,
considering uncentered is not all that bad. It is just that in
some particular cases (like the wedding pages I have just made)
it looks the right thing to do as a finishing thing.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|