|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 07/02/05 02:50
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:21:57 GMT, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>> You disable JavaScript...does one get any more stupid than
>>>> that?
>>> Yes, by allowing unsigned ActiveX controls.
>> JavaScript allows unsigned ActiveX controls, eh?
>You failed to catch the meaning of the statement.
It's what you say, not what you mean that counts.
>Sorry.
I would imagine you have quite a lot to be sorry for.
>Read your next line.
Why, I remember what I wrote.
>>> ActiveX does not work in Firefox,
>> ...which sort of begs the question...why did you disable JavaScript
>> then?
>Because I can.
You could also shoot yourself in the head. Just because you can do
something doesn't mean that you should...although in your case,
really, shooting yourself in the head might turn out to be a good
thing.
>And any web author worth his salt does not use
>JavaScript for any critical content.
Oh? And why is that? Now ya see Cupcake, the problem with you is
that you're starting to retard into the position of poor lil Richie.
In other words, yer runnin at the fuckin mouth. You just keep
TALKING, but you're not doing anything to PROVE your position. Really
the ONLY argument one could even come up with for disabling JavaScript
would be as an extra measure to block popups...but um, isn't yer
magical FireFox browser supposed to do that WITHOUT disabling
JavaScript? Cause um, Internet Explorer does. ^_^
Oh...btw...
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
JavaScript usage - January - 89% enabled - 11% disabled
And on my CB site (which doesn't use any JavaScript):
http://extremetracking.com/open;sys?login=bwcb
JavaScript usage - January - 99% enabled - 1% disabled
So what the fuck are you doin, MORON? What did you miss a meeting or
something? The "Ways NOT To Be A Dumbass" meeting? If your only goal
in disabling JavaScript is to try and block popups that's pretty much
like cutting off your head to spite your body.
>You do know that your most important visitor does not have JavaScript, right?
You do know that none of my sites are built to cater to idiocy, right?
>>> only in a certain operating system component that masquerades as
>>> a browser, and which is never used on any of my computers.
>> Your browser preference has no meaning what so ever to me, I'm
>> sorry that you thought it did.
>Yeah, I knew that.
And as fucking retarded as you are, you seem to think I have some
particular preference as far as browsers, just to make it perfectly
clear to you child...I don't.
>>> Smart people would have known that. :-)
>> A smart person probably would have figured out that he wouldn't
>> need to disable JavaScript that can supposedly allow unsigned
>> ActiveX controls in a browser that doesn't even support any ActiveX
>> controls in the first place...boy I tell ya, you're just like the
>> mayor of stupid town or something.
>You seem to be the only one who feels that JavaScript and ActiveX are
>in any way related. I certainly know they are not.
Then why did you imply that JavaScript somehow can enable unsigned
ActiveX controls?
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|