|
Posted by Richard Cornford on 07/02/05 05:28
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> Richard Cornford" wrote:
>>Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> In alt.html, Richard Cornford wrote:
>>>> All? You should try taking a look at what you have done
>>>> form a variety of remote locations:-
>>>>
>>>> http://www.litotes.demon.co.uk/bw.gif
>>>>(144Kb: screenshot of the
>>>> above URL screwing up royally)
>>>
>>> How'd you get that?
>
>>Easy, you can see from the original script that no thought
>>has gone into caching and so the images will tend to be cached.
>>So I made my initial request with a small browser window,
>>loading the scaled-down version of the images, and then re-sized
>>upwards. The page re-load got the same scaled-down inmates from
>>an intervening cache (and so will anyone else who now visits the
>>site through the same cache :).
>
> Here ya go, Kiddo...for the benefit of your idiocy:
> http://www.techspot.com/tweaks/ie6/ie-3.shtml
>
> Try actually READING for once...specifically the part where
> it says: "Check for newer versions of stored pages."
So you are proposing that I change my browser's caching settings to the
current setting? Now that is not going to make a lot of difference, is
it?
I could see from your code that you just don't have a handle on the
issue, but thanks from making that obvious.
> I suppose maybe I could take blatant stupidity into account
> more and use a time stamp on teh file names, but then really
> Richie, would you have ANYTHING left to bitch and moan about?
I could see from your code that you just don't have a handle on the
issue, but thanks from making that doubly obvious.
Richard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|