|
Posted by Steve on 04/24/07 04:29
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1tWdnQQTAbId1rDbnZ2dnUVZ_vTinZ2d@comcast.com...
| Gordon Burditt wrote:
| >>> data is in the db. a query will return the correct step that is next
in the
| >>> ladder of steps to get to the top. user logs back in, that step is
| >>> displayed. now, pray-tell, HOW IS THE DATA LOST?
| >>>
| >>>
| >> And your mind is completely unable to grasp a simple concept. If the
| >> session is lost and there is no user login, there is no way to
reference
| >> the row in the table related to this user.
| >>
| >> You have 500 users currently active. Suddenly one of them loses a
| >> session. Now - WHICH OF THOSE FIVE HUNDRED ROWS IS RELATED TO THAT
| >> USER? THERE IS NOT LOGIN!
| >
| > His solution to that is to display 500 credit card numbers and names
| > and addresses, mostly of other people, and let the user choose his.
| >
| > Even without privacy and security issues, it sounds a lot easier
| > to just start over, or better, go to a different web site run by a
| > different company entirely.
| >
|
| That sounds about right!
lol...and that's about the quality of any argument i've ever seen you
defend. lots of bark with no bites to show for the noise.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|