|
|
Posted by Adrienne Boswell on 05/10/07 08:22
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed bigdaddybs <bidarsan@hotmail.com>
writing in news:1178784422.180329.272100@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> I DO understand the "text only" alternative, but would think a WYSIWYG
> would be enormously helpful in creating prototype and example pages
> (templates), THEN use the "direct HTML editing" of those pages, if you
> insist. AND, you are correct in that WYSIWYG editors (all of them)
> will add code, if you aren't careful, that isn't needed, or will leave
> out tags you DO need for validations.
>
>
Typical Template for me (I do a lot of ASP)
<% option explicit
thispage = "Name of the page" 'name of the page
thisurl = "nameofpage.asp" 'actual url
%>
<!--#include file="linkrel.asp"-->
</head>
<body>
<!--#include file="h1_inc.asp"-->
<!--#include file="nav_inc.asp"-->
<div id="content">
</div>
<!--#include file="footer_inc.asp"-->
--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|