|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/08/07 22:50
In article <UKkai.6415$NV3.1345@pd7urf2no>,
"M" <nowhereman@twilightzone.net> wrote:
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:doraymeRidThis-148165.07504409062007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>
> > It was at the end of his post, he didn't have time to "start"
> > arguing "against it". The point of the business cards story was
> > to say that it would be nice for web authors to have have some
> > extra weaponry in font choices.
>
> More or less. My point was about image branding, part of which will include
> your on-line presence.
>
> The original OP was attempting to maintain a consistent brand-image across
> different mediums.
>
> The whole "web is not paper" thing is something else again. I don't dispute
> that. Some people are determined to make it that way though by confusing
> lack of design skills with arguments about the need to maintain max
> flexibility.
I cannot see that they are confusing these two things. My enemies
have many faults, but I don't think this is one of them. They
just like pushing a message and don't like anything, no matter
how subtle, getting in the way unless it comes from some high
authority, and then it gets to be wooden and simple again and
brought in from the cold into the fundamentalist chanting.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|