|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 06/17/07 20:56
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
>> erkkikosonen@nerdshack.com wrote:
>>> I can also still remember the Netscape version that showed a blank
>>> page instead of the table on the page.
>> Yeah back in Mosaic days maybe.
>
> As I remember, Netscape would not display a table if any parts of
> elements were missing, such as </table>. The page would only be blank if
> everything inside <body> was in that table.
Well Netscape 4.x was like that, I have a copy of 4.6 for testing. But
it *will* show a table if giving valid markup. But I don't know what the
OP is talking about with browsers having trouble with tables in general...
>
> Good ole HTML 2.0 ... I think I'll switch tomorrow.
>
Heck, go one better, plain old text!
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|