Posted by cluthz on 06/19/07 01:06

"Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message >
> A basic example that should work can be found at the link I sent you
> in my post!
>
> What you are doing wrong is putting a comma where the working example
> does not have one.


OK great I'll try this out. any opinion on what those other links I sent say
about it not being as efficient as running two sql queries in some cases?

• Next in forum: Re: Large query results - Limiting the data, but still knowing the full row count - How?
• Prev in forum: Re: Large query results - Limiting the data, but still knowing the full row count - How?
• Thread view: Re: Large query results - Limiting the data, but still knowing the full row count - How?

[Reply to this message]