|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 06/25/07 14:31
On 25 Jun, 14:07, Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettri...@aol.com> wrote:
> But if nobody here can give me an hint,
Of course we can't - you posted 5 lines snipped from a long document,
rather than giving us a YURl to the whole thing.
> I'll stay with converting the files into better conforming HTML...
It's less about "better conforming HTML" and more about converting
from an XML format that isn't HTML and bears only a passing
resemblance to it. To do that you need knowledge of HTML and knowledge
of the other XML schema too. As it's from M$oft it's probably unstable
against change, poorly documented, badly thought out, may even be
formally invalid and almost certainly hard to find any documentation
for at all. As M$oft are now threatening to eat their own young
(sorry, sue their own Most Valued Professionals for unspecified
copyright infringement), then I for one have no interest in knowing
any more about their products.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|