|
|
Posted by windandwaves on 07/03/07 01:52
On Jul 3, 12:55 pm, "rf" <r...@invalid.com> wrote:
> "windandwaves" <nfranc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1183414490.911346.144380@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jul 2, 4:15 pm, "rf" <r...@invalid.com> wrote:
> >> "windandwaves" <nfranc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1183348781.350065.190500@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Jul 2, 3:46 pm, "rf" <r...@invalid.com> wrote:
> >> >> "windandwaves" <nfranc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> > Thanks a million for your help. Fantastic. Much appreciated. I
> >> >> > have
> >> >> > implemented a number of recommendations and the site is looking
> >> >> > better
> >> >> > now! thank you.http://www.sunnysideup.co.nz/thatis.
>
> >> >> Nope :-).
>
> >> >>http://barefile.com.au/ssu.jpg-61K*heavily* compressed.
> >> > Hi Richard try refreshing it. It works fine for me now.
>
> >> I tried refreshing it. Many times.
>
> >> Clearing my cache did work but that is a little bit drastic :-)
>
> >> IE6 is still glaringly red.
>
> >> --
> >> Richard.
>
> > Hi Richard
>
> > Should work now. Sorry for the delay. IE6 - hmmmm, well, fixed now,
> > but who would use it?
>
> IE6: Now I get a bloody arrogant message telling me to upgrade my browser.
> It is not the job of a web site flogging web sites to tell me to upgrade my
> browser. If I were a potential customer that insult alone would make me move
> along to the next search result.
>
> FF: It's back to what it was yesterday. On initial load it looks OK for half
> a second. Then your broken javascript kicks in and makes the content about
> half again as wide as my screen.
What is the size of your screen and did it matter that the size of the
text was reduced? (thinner columns read easier (e.g. newspapers /
magazines).
>
> As I said a while ago why use perfectly good CS and then cover it up with
> broken javascript.
>
> Until you remove that defective javascript your site will remain broken. You
> do not need it (other than to post bloody arrogant messages).
>
> Your "thumbnails" are still not thumbnails and your menu remains backwards.
>
> --
> Richard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|