|
|
Posted by Blinky the Shark on 07/08/07 20:36
Sherm Pendley wrote:
> GreatArtist <wizzzer@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> I don't care what you think about XHTML. I didn't ask you!
>> Garrick Chow, who I respect far more than you, recommends XHTML 1.0
>> transitional.
>
> Your respect is misplaced. XHTML, while nice enough in theory, has any
> number of problems in practice that prevent it from being useful in the
> real world.
>
> I have far more respect for someone who has the backbone to tell it like
> it is, rather than pandering to the clueless masses in order to make more
> money from book sales.
Is there any reason to create a new site in transitional *anything*, as
versus strict?
--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|