|
|
Posted by dorayme on 07/10/07 23:21
In article
<Xns9968ED0BC15D5nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> ell, Duh!, it could hardly be higher now, could it? The only other
> possibility was right on the head, which didn't seem particularly likely
> for a first attempt.
Look here, what is the matter with you. Read my words carefully.
Go back and see how I said it could be higher, how you might have
made a mistake in reasoning or figuring. Is that not possible at
all (in the absence of any knowledge of the true solution)?
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|