|
|
Posted by dorayme on 07/11/07 22:11
In article
<Xns996A704A88BC9nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> One day I was walking home from school with a Jewish friend and I happened
> to use the word schmuck. He told me then what it meant and he got pretty
> serious. I hadn't called him it, I'd just used it in conversion but that
> still affected him. He was usually a light-hearted, very easy-going guy.
> Anyway, it was then that I started to realize slur words weren't funny to a
> lot of people whether rendered comedically or not.
What a load of hypocritical bullshit. You have felt no compulsion
to make the most outrageous slurs, time and time again, to engage
in language and aspersions that must be quite offensive to many
people and here you confounding all sorts of issues and
associations and personal experiences to get on some moral soap
box.
You have it wrong about schmuck. Simple as that.
It is most common in American comedic talk as mentioned in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck
Remember, it is 2007. Study the idea of the vernacular. I was not
calling people here generally. I was calling you a schmuck.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|