Posted by Paul Furman on 07/26/07 18:37

Paul Furman wrote:

> Paul Furman wrote:
>
>> I've been going through doing some search engine friendliness updates
>> with rewrite rules and would like to clean up some php query strings
>> like ?PG=2&PIC=5
>>
>> I'm thinking /2/5 is not going to work because I have folders named /2
>> in some cases
>
> You know, I can work around this so nevermind. I think /2/5 is the most
> straightforward way to handle it unless someone disagrees

Ack scratch that, it *IS* a problem I'm going to implement it as /pg1pc5
but if you got better ideas I can change that. Apparently # is a special
character for browsers.


>> so maybe it's more like /2~5 but that's just weird using funny
>> characters or /pg2#5
>>
>> You'd think I could come up with something decent but I'm just not
>> sure. Any suggestions?
>>
>>
>> For now my links look like this:
>> http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=0_gallery/0-Photo-Update/2007-06-24&PG=1&PIC=1
>>
>> I've got it down to this (not uploaded yet):
>> http://www.edgehill.net/1/gallery/photo-update/2007-06-24?PG=1&PIC=1
>> and soon I'll have this:
>> http://www.edgehill.net/gallery/photo-update/2007-06-24?PG=1&PIC=1
>>
>> Also, is there any reason not to chop off the www:
>> http://edgehill.net/gallery/photo-update/2007-06-24
>>
>> Oh, and I could change 2007-06-24 to 6-24-07
>>
>> So the final urls would look like:
>> http://edgehill.net/gallery/photo-update/6-24-07/pg2#5
>> ... or whatever looks best on the page & pic numbers...
>>
>> Thanks for your ideas,
>>
>
>


--
Paul Furman Photography
http://www.edgehill.net/1
Bay Natives Nursery
http://www.baynatives.com

• Next in forum: Re: Hey Spacey, Have You Tried This?
• Prev in forum: Re: nicer url thoughts?
• Thread view: Re: nicer url thoughts?

[Reply to this message]