|
|
Posted by SpaceGirl on 08/01/07 09:51
On Aug 1, 4:38 am, Neredbojias <monstersquas...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:06:07
> GMT SpaceGirl scribed:
>
> >> Uh huh, -or $799. I browsed the Adobe site, looking at both Flash
> >> and Flex (? -I think that's the name). There was an 11 minute demo
> >> of a page made with Flex, -the demo being a representation of the
> >> programming involved. 'Bout all I can say is:
>
> >> YEAH, RIGHT!
>
> >> I'd be dead before I learned all that shit! Not all of us are
> >> Microsoftish Miracle Boys, and while I may sometimes bite off more
> >> than I can chew, I've never tried to eat a brontosaurus, either.
> >> Forget it.
>
> > Chewy, but nice :)
>
> Hell, I'd rather eat a shark (-Blinky excepted.)
Having eaten shark (shark fins, in Tokyo), I'd rather eat shark too :)
It's tasty!
> Seriously, it looks prett-yy complicated. I'm just a down-on-the-farm good
> ol' country boy who's currently working on the next "Saucy Aussie" stamp
> so, ergo, learning a whole plethora of new commands, procedures, and
> techniques doesn't particularly appeal to me or my thinking machine at the
> moment. Besides, seeing Duende around reminds me of what can happen when
> you take too deep a plunge, so to speak.
I'm a designer first, programmer second. The only reason I learned
*any* programming was that the visual things I wanted to do couldn't
be done any other way. I don't regret learning to program, but I don't
really like doing it much. It is very satisfying though when a
particular design that I did a lot of coding on is a success. I don't
thing design should be a static thing when it is online, and the only
way to achieve this is to interact with the user. It's very hard to do
this without creating some sort of logic.
On the other hand, if there was some other way of doing it, I'd quite
happily never program again!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|