|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 08/01/07 17:38
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:42:33 -0700, Chaddy2222
> <spamlovermailbox-sicurity@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> >> Oh so then you think a PLAIN TEXT site would be superior to
> >> say...this:
> >> http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/yoga-online/
>
> >Yes!.
>
> ...okay lemme see if I got this right...you think a plain textual
> description of yoga positions would somehow be BETTER than video clips
> showing REAL PEOPLE in the positions and doing the yoga exercises?
>
> ...WHAT?!
You obviously have no idea of what I siad or did NOT read it
correctly.
I have nothing against the use of Flash and actually in the case of
that site both a description of the steps involved and the video would
be ideal.
>
> You really are an idiot and I really don't mean that in a playful
> manner, I mean you REALLY ARE an idiot.
WELL, if that's what you want to think then go right ahead.... Might I
remind you that there are laws regarding web accessibility and that
you can be sued for siscrimonation if your sites do not meet
particular regulations, and they don't just govern government sites.
http://www.tomw.net.au/2001/bat2001f.html
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|